The Hand of Ethelberta
Following the success ofFar from the Madding CrowdHardy was invited to provide another serial for theCornhill Magazine. Unwilling to be typecast as a writer of pastoral fiction he submitted, in his own words, the beginning of a tale calledThe Hand of Ethelberta A Comedy in Chapterswhich had nothing whatever in common with anything he had written before. The serialisation began in July, 1875, and the novel was published in two-volume form in April, 1876.
It was an audacious work in several ways. Ethelberta Petherwin, the heroine, is the dominant figure in the narrative: beautiful, enterprising and outspoken, she becomes a social celebrity through her poetry and her performances as an oral story-teller. Her several wealthy admirers do not guess that her father is a butler and that various of her siblings are servants and labourers. She resourcefully assumes responsibility for the entire family, at one point in effect employing a number of them as domestic staff in her London home. The plot of the novel, as so often in Hardy, is eventually shaped by the heroines need to choose between competing suitors.
The central situation provides occasion for a good deal of subversive social comment, culminating in the irony of Ethelbertas lower-class family desperately trying to prevent what they regard as her unsuitable marriage to a lord. Yet the novel is hardly situated in the real world. As Hardy himself later acknowledged in a Preface: A high degree of probability was not attempted in the arrangement of the incidents, and there was expected of the reader a certain lightness of mood,... In fact the story is fantastical, and the narrative mode recurrently harks back to the stylised stage comedies of Congreve or Sheridan. Some of the characters actually have names derived from the theatre of manners Menlove, Ladywell, Tipman, Neigh. Many a conversation is shaped into a exchange of epigrams. Hardys mixed medium is only intermittently successful: there is undoubtedly a tension between the sardonic social commentary and the brittle contrivances of the story-telling and some portions of the dialogue. Later, however, in such plays asPygmalionandMrs Warrens Profession, Bernard Shaw was to produce striking social parables in very much this artificial vein. Hardy, perhaps not unreasonably, came to think thatThe Hand of Ethelbertaappeared thirty-five years too soon.
The limitations of the work, however, have less to do with the problems posed by the mixture of modes than with uncertainties of pace and direction. Hardy has difficulty in holding his multifarious story together. The action can be haphazard: various narrative leads simply expire. Seemingly significant characters disappear for long stretches, or are left with nothing much to do. Others are hustled to and fro apparently at random. Particularly towards the end there is an effect of pure muddle: Hardy seems to be desperately improvising plot developments that will bulk out his novel to the required length and take it over some sort of finishing line.
AltogetherThe Hand of Ethelbertais an oddity - an intriguing and feisty experiment only intermittently in tune with the authors talents.